Home / News / I love the confusion, but ChatGPT’s new search feature is pulling me back

I love the confusion, but ChatGPT’s new search feature is pulling me back

38
Query using Perplexity Pro and displaying the results.

Key things

  • ChatGPT’s new real-time search feature offers up-to-date answers, direct links to resources, and seamless follow-up questions.
  • ChatGPT’s integrated experience, conversation flow, and real-time information are winners when we add web searchable resources.



The latest ChatGPT search update made me reconsider my preference for Perplexity. While Perplexity has been reliable for a long time, ChatGPT’s new capabilities have led me to return to the original generative AI chatbot.


Confusion was my helper in my search. Provides reliable, source-backed answers. It is versatile enough for both productivity and research tasks. I could easily complete entire research projects, and the way Perplexity intuitively presents resources and data makes it easy to navigate search results. I also really like his ability to handle follow-up questions, allowing me to delve deeper into related topics. This kind of control and transparency is a major plus for productivity, plus Perplexity’s clear references make fact-checking easy.


What is the ChatGPT search function?

An image of the current web search using ChatGPT.

OpenAI launched ChatGPT Search and added a new dimension to the tool. It now pulls real-time information from the web and gives me up-to-the-minute answers on trending topics, news and even sports scores, all with in-chat feeds. Confusion about this has always been great, but adding this feature to ChatGPT means I can do everything I need to with a single tool, making my workflow much smoother.

I also like how ChatGPT maintains context from previous questions so subsequent conversations are easy. The flow feels natural and I can dive deeper without losing track.


Confusion vs. ChatGPT Search: What Offers a Better Experience?

When I compare Perplexity and ChatGPT, it’s clear that they have distinct strengths and weaknesses. Both have made significant progress in providing concise information, but be careful not to rely on them as the sole source of information for critical research.

Natural search with access to results on the web.

Perplexity excels in its clarity and precision, especially when I need verifiable and referable data for research. His evidence-based answers can easily be traced back to specific sources, increasing my confidence in their accuracy. I also appreciate how Perplexity breaks down complex topics into digestible chunks and suggests related searches, making my research easy and efficient.


On the other hand, ChatGPT has become much more useful for me when I need real-time updates on trends. The new search feature makes interactions more dynamic, and ChatGPT’s ability to preserve context means I can dive deeper into a topic without having to re-explain my questions. This contextual flow really shines when exploring complex topics in a conversational way.

That said, neither platform is perfect. Confusion often requires well-crafted prompts to get in-depth answers, while ChatGPT can be inconsistent in linking to reliable sources. Still, I see both tools getting better with each update, and each has its own unique value depending on what I need.

Why ChatGPT wins me over

boy playing on pc using chatgpt in bedroom
DALL-E/MakeUseOf


While I’ve always appreciated Perplexity, ChatGPT’s new features are winning me over. It’s incredibly convenient to go from asking a generative AI question to getting up-to-date search results without switching apps. Instead of juggling multiple tools to search and verify answers, ChatGPT gives me an all-in-one experience that saves time and makes my searches much smoother.

I also like how ChatGPT keeps the conversation flowing. It remembers my previous questions, making follow-ups natural and efficient, more like a continuous conversation rather than a series of disjointed questions.

Of course, some areas still lag, such as consistency and nuance, which seem to be common challenges for AI chatbots. For example, ChatGPT sometimes lacks the emotional depth or contextual subtleties you expect from a human-written summary. But I have to admit that the recent improvements make it much better to use. In many ways, it combines what I love about Perplexity with the added flexibility of real-time information.


This means that ChatGPT still has some inconsistencies regarding source reliability. While real-time information is useful, the links it provides aren’t always the most reputable. This is where I think Perplexity has a slight edge; I can always count on him for accuracy and well-documented references.

I still appreciate Perplexity for its accuracy and reliability, but ChatGPT’s search feature gave it a competitive edge. Real-time information, smooth transitions and comprehensive responses make it harder and harder to stay away.

Both tools have value, and I still turn to Perplexity when I need accurate, well-referenced data. However, ChatGPT’s combination of generative answers with real-time search results has made it my preferred choice for a wider range of questions. Convenience, depth of conversation, and up-to-date information make it a compelling option that’s hard to resist.


Comments